Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

 

ArticlesEmployment & LaborU.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Teacher’s Firing

September 6, 20180

PS&H employment partner and Chair of the Employment & Labor Group, Alicia Samolis, provided comment to RI Lawyers Weekly on the recent 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Richard v. Regional School Unit 57. In a split decision, the Court upheld the lower court judge’s decision, after a bench trial, that the teacher’s termination was not retaliatory even though the judge did not believe the employer’s stated reason for the teacher’s termination.

In an article published by RI Lawyers Weekly, Alicia, who was not involved in the case, explained that the U.S. District Court judge “did not impute to the decisionmaker the knowledge of others within the organization. If the decisionmaker is not aware of protected conduct, there can be no liability for retaliation.”

The First Circuit Court of Appeals correctly rejected the plaintiff’s argument on appeal in finding that the School’s stated reason for the termination was pretextual and guaranteed the plaintiff a win.

Alicia stated “the factfinder still has to believe the adverse action is for the illegal reason claimed by the employee.”

“There could be reasons for the termination that the employer would not want to admit to, such as personal dislike or frustration over complaints from students’ parents, but they aren’t retaliatory,” Alicia added.

Fact finders, particularly jurors, are likely to find illegal motives when the fact finder does not believe the employer’s stated reasons for its actions. They are also likely to find that individuals in the same organization share critical information. The fact finder is free to form his or her own conclusions as to both issues.

Click here to read the full article (subscription required).

Get In Touch

    General Inquiry
    • General Inquiry
    • Careers
    • Commercial Finance
    • Corporate & Business
    • Employment & Labor
    • Litigation & Disputes
    • Nonprofit & Tax-Exempt
    • Private Clients
    • Real Estate
    • Newsletter Signup

    Leave a Reply

    https://www.psh.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/PSH-320x212.png

    Follow us:

    PROVIDENCE OFFICE

    40 Westminster Street
    Suite 1100
    Providence, RI  02903

    BOSTON OFFICE

    30 Federal Street
    Boston, MA  02110

    SOUTHCOAST OFFICE

    128 Union Street
    Suite 500
    New Bedford, MA  02740

    Copyright ©️ 2024 Partridge Snow & Hahn | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer